Markdown

Industry

Travel and lodging

Travel and lodging holds 37 Schema.org types you can mark up, and fourteen of them sit on fewer than a thousand websites. Google documents one rich result that starts from a type in this industry. The terms below are here because one of their parent types is, and the parent that placed them travels with them so you can follow the reasoning back yourself.

What you can mark up

July 2026 · six ranges, no exact numbersGoogle and the Schema.org community, Schema.org usage statistics dataset. Websites in Google's index.

The websites column is a band, not a count, because Google publishes six ranges and not the figure inside one. The last column names the ancestor that put a term into travel and lodging, which is the difference between a derivation and a guess. A term that is one of this industry's own roots names itself there. It is also why a type such as Dentist lands in medical and health and not in local business, even though it is honestly both. I made that call once, in the ordering, and it applies to your type the same way.

The 37 Schema.org types in travel and lodging, with the websites using each one in July 2026. Websites is a band, never an exact count.
TermWebsitesMovementover 3 monthsPlaced byits root or an ancestor
Hotel100K - 1MUpLodgingBusiness
Accommodation10K - 100KNo changeAccommodation
Apartment10K - 100KNo changeAccommodation
HotelRoom10K - 100KNo changeAccommodation
House10K - 100KNo changeAccommodation
LodgingBusiness10K - 100KNo changeLodgingBusiness
Reservation10K - 100KNo changeReservation
SingleFamilyResidence10K - 100KNo changeAccommodation
TouristAttraction10K - 100KNo changeTouristAttraction
TouristDestination10K - 100KNo changeTouristDestination
TouristTrip10K - 100KNo changeTrip
Trip10K - 100KNo changeTrip
VacationRental10K - 100KNo changeLodgingBusiness
BedAndBreakfast1K - 10KNo changeLodgingBusiness
BusTrip1K - 10KUpTrip
Campground1K - 10KNo changeLodgingBusiness
Flight1K - 10KNo changeTrip
FoodEstablishmentReservation1K - 10KNo changeReservation
Hostel1K - 10KNo changeLodgingBusiness
LodgingReservation1K - 10KNo changeReservation
MeetingRoom1K - 10KNo changeAccommodation
Resort1K - 10KNo changeLodgingBusiness
Room1K - 10KNo changeAccommodation
BoatReservation< 1KNo changeReservation
BoatTrip< 1KNo changeTrip
BusReservation< 1KNo changeReservation
CampingPitch< 1KNo changeAccommodation
EventReservation< 1KNo changeReservation
FlightReservation< 1KNo changeReservation
Motel< 1KNo changeLodgingBusiness
RentalCarReservation< 1KNo changeReservation
ReservationPackage< 1KNo changeReservation
SkiResort< 1KNo changeLodgingBusiness
Suite< 1KNo changeAccommodation
TaxiReservation< 1KNo changeReservation
TrainReservation< 1KNo changeReservation
TrainTrip< 1KNo changeTrip

What Google documents

Beside the feature sits the primary Schema.org type it is about, so you can see why it belongs to this industry and not to another one. The address is Google's own page for that feature, and the date beside it is when Google last changed that page. A requirement quoted without a date is a claim about a target that has already moved, so the two travel together here. If you build one of these, I would check the date first.

Google rich result features whose primary Schema.org type sits in travel and lodging. Read from Google's own pages on 11 August 2026.
FeaturePrimary typeStatusGoogle pagePage updated
Vacation rentalVacationRentalLivevacation-rental

What almost nobody does yet

Fourteen of the 37 types here sit in Google's smallest band, meaning fewer than a thousand websites use them. Almost nobody has tried these. There is no common implementation to copy, and no way to tell from adoption alone whether the silence is an opening or a lack of interest. What the band does tell you is that very few examples of the term exist for anything to learn from, so a rare type is a bet, not a safe default. If one of them is exactly your business, I would still write it, and expect to be the example others copy.

The 14 types in travel and lodging used by fewer than a thousand websites in July 2026.
TermMovementover 3 monthsPlaced byits root or an ancestor
BoatReservationNo changeReservation
BoatTripNo changeTrip
BusReservationNo changeReservation
CampingPitchNo changeAccommodation
EventReservationNo changeReservation
FlightReservationNo changeReservation
MotelNo changeLodgingBusiness
RentalCarReservationNo changeReservation
ReservationPackageNo changeReservation
SkiResortNo changeLodgingBusiness
SuiteNo changeAccommodation
TaxiReservationNo changeReservation
TrainReservationNo changeReservation
TrainTripNo changeTrip

How this is measured

I sort all of Google's 937 classes into an industry by walking their parent types through Schema.org's own hierarchy, then read the terms' adoption from Google's July 2026 usage file. Travel and lodging holds 37 of those classes. None of that grouping comes from matching a name. That matters more than it sounds, because my first attempt did match names and produced entirely plausible counts that were guesses. If you regroup the classes yourself and land a type on a different page, the ancestor column is where we would disagree.

Two kinds of claim sit side by side on these pages and they are not equally strong. A type reaches its industry one way. By ancestry through rdfs:subClassOf, never by name. Each assignment records the ancestor that produced it. A Google rich result feature is a page on Google's website, not a Schema.org type, so it has no parent to walk and it reaches its industry another way. One recorded judgement per feature, its primary Schema.org type, then assigned by the same ancestry walk. You can check those judgments against Google's own documentation, because the features carry the addresses of the pages they came from.

That walk reads an ordered list of industries, most specific first, because LocalBusiness is a subclass of both Organization and Place and the three cannot all be industries. A type takes the first industry it matches on the way up, so it lands on one page and not on three. The assignment keeps the ancestor that won. I show that ancestor beside the term on the industry pages, so you can see why a type sits where it does and disagree with me if you want to.

The adoption figures here are bands, not counts. Google sorts the terms into six bands and publishes nothing inside them, so a term you can see on somewhere between one and ten million websites has no public exact number, on this page or anywhere else. A longer list of types does not mean a bigger industry in the economy either. These figures count vocabulary terms, not businesses or websites.

The subhub lists all the industries. You can download the figures as JSON or CSV and check any line here against them.

Snapshot July 2026. 3 months archived. Built 19 August 2026.

Analysis © Eduard Dziak, licensed under the Apache License 2.0. Please credit eduarddziak.com with a link. Source data: Google and the Schema.org community, Schema.org usage statistics dataset. Rich result requirements: Google Search Central, licensed CC BY 4.0. Term descriptions: Schema.org, licensed CC BY-SA 3.0, each term linking to its own page. Crawl counts: HTTP Archive Web Almanac, licensed Apache License 2.0.